Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Addition u/s 68 - Penny stock purchases - addition on account of Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG) which the assessee derived from sale of scrip - exemption u/s 10(38) denied - there is nothing against the assessee and no inquiry whatsoever has been done by the AO or the Ld CIT (A) - both the lower authorities were not justified in not allowing the appellant’s claim for exemption u/s 10(38) in respect of the profit derived by the appellant - AT
Addition u/s 68 - Penny stock purchases - addition on account of Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG) which the assessee derived from sale of scrip - exemption u/s 10(38) denied - there is nothing against the assessee and no inquiry whatsoever has been done by the AO or the Ld CIT (A) - both the lower authorities were not justified in not allowing the appellant’s claim for exemption u/s 10(38) in respect of the profit derived by the appellant - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
