Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Profiteering - purchase of Flat - allegation is that the benefit of input tax credit had not been passed on - project was not under execution before coming into force of the GST - Since there is no basis for comparison of ITC available before and after 01.07.2017, the Respondent is not required to recalibrate the price of the flat due to additional benefit of ITC. Hence, the allegations of the Applicants made in this behalf are incorrect and therefore, the same cannot be accepted - NAPA
Profiteering - purchase of Flat - allegation is that the benefit of input tax credit had not been passed on - project was not under execution before coming into force of the GST - Since there is no basis for comparison of ITC available before and after 01.07.2017, the Respondent is not required to recalibrate the price of the flat due to additional benefit of ITC. Hence, the allegations of the Applicants made in this behalf are incorrect and therefore, the same cannot be accepted - NAPA
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.