Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Seeking revival of GST registration so that the petitioner can file GST-R1 and GST-R3B returns regularly - Removal of name of company from register of companies - In this case, there is a deliberate attempt on the part of the private respondents to close down the business and thereby impact the profits of the business carried out by the petitioner from unit B. The National Company Law Tribunal is also seized of the matter, which started in the year 2003, it has not seen the final conclusion till date. - petitioner directed to take steps to revive the GST registration, which stands cancelled. - HC
Seeking revival of GST registration so that the petitioner can file GST-R1 and GST-R3B returns regularly - Removal of name of company from register of companies - In this case, there is a deliberate attempt on the part of the private respondents to close down the business and thereby impact the profits of the business carried out by the petitioner from unit B. The National Company Law Tribunal is also seized of the matter, which started in the year 2003, it has not seen the final conclusion till date. - petitioner directed to take steps to revive the GST registration, which stands cancelled. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.