Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Customs Assessment Portal centralises classification and valuation guidance to support consistent, transparent and informed compliance across stakehol...
Condonation of delay in filing appeal - appeal have been filed after 505 days from the date of despatch - address has been mentioned wrongly for despatch - presumption of service - the presumption drawn by the learned Commissioner (Appeals) is wholly erroneous and against all canons of justice. In this view of the matter, the appellant have received the order-in- original only on 28.07.2020, and thus they have filed the appeal within the prescribed time as allowable under Section 35 of the Central Excise Act. - AT
Condonation of delay in filing appeal - appeal have been filed after 505 days from the date of despatch - address has been mentioned wrongly for despatch - presumption of service - the presumption drawn by the learned Commissioner (Appeals) is wholly erroneous and against all canons of justice. In this view of the matter, the appellant have received the order-in- original only on 28.07.2020, and thus they have filed the appeal within the prescribed time as allowable under Section 35 of the Central Excise Act. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4920 
