Coercive recovery during GST searches is restrained pending scrutiny, preserving normal business operations and requiring adherence to investigation g...
COVID-19 limitation exclusion and destination-specific e-way bills govern revisional timelines and penalties for undocumented third-party plywood deli...
Questions arising from miscellaneous application orders cannot challenge unaltered Tribunal findings, leaving the original order separately challengea...
Transfer-pricing comparability filters require fresh arm's-length analysis, while delayed receivables need separate reconsideration with working-capit...
Page of 4894
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
721 to 740 of 97867 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Validity of final order of confiscation - ex-parte order - this writ application is not entertained on the short ground that the writ applicant has a statutory remedy of filing an appeal before the Appellate Authority under Section 107 of the Act. If any appeal is filed, the writ applicant can take up, as one of the grounds while challenging the final order of confiscation, that the same is ex-parte, or to put it in other words, no opportunity of hearing was given to the dealer. - HC
Validity of final order of confiscation - ex-parte order - this writ application is not entertained on the short ground that the writ applicant has a statutory remedy of filing an appeal before the Appellate Authority under Section 107 of the Act. If any appeal is filed, the writ applicant can take up, as one of the grounds while challenging the final order of confiscation, that the same is ex-parte, or to put it in other words, no opportunity of hearing was given to the dealer. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4894 
