Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Revision u/s 263 by CIT - direction to the AO to compute income of the appellant Trust without allowing exemption u/s. 10(23C)(iiiae) - All the conditions as prescribed u/s.10(23C)(iiiae) of the Act, have been fulfilled by the appellant Trust and there is no allegation that the appellant Trust is involved in any other activity for profit or does not exist for philanthropic purposes. Even in this case, all the facts are on the file, therefore there was no need for any further investigation by the A.O. as alleged by the Ld. CIT(E). - AT
Revision u/s 263 by CIT - direction to the AO to compute income of the appellant Trust without allowing exemption u/s. 10(23C)(iiiae) - All the conditions as prescribed u/s.10(23C)(iiiae) of the Act, have been fulfilled by the appellant Trust and there is no allegation that the appellant Trust is involved in any other activity for profit or does not exist for philanthropic purposes. Even in this case, all the facts are on the file, therefore there was no need for any further investigation by the A.O. as alleged by the Ld. CIT(E). - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.