Appellate jurisdiction over baggage imports is excluded, requiring confiscation challenges involving passenger-carried gold to proceed by statutory re...
Page of 4901
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
261 to 280 of 98020 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
100% EOU - served from India scheme (SFIS) - Recovery of duties of customs foregone - There is no finding in the order of the original authority holding the goods liable to confiscation; the imposition of penalty under section 112 of Customs Act, 1962 is without authority of law. Neither is there any finding on the confiscability of goods under rule 25 of Central Excise Act, 1944 and the imposition of penalty thereunder is, therefore, without authority of law. - AT
100% EOU - served from India scheme (SFIS) - Recovery of duties of customs foregone - There is no finding in the order of the original authority holding the goods liable to confiscation; the imposition of penalty under section 112 of Customs Act, 1962 is without authority of law. Neither is there any finding on the confiscability of goods under rule 25 of Central Excise Act, 1944 and the imposition of penalty thereunder is, therefore, without authority of law. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4901 
