Duplicate PAN allocation requires record verification and deactivation reasons before assessment-related transactions can be attributed to an assessee...
Faceless assessment safeguards require requested personal hearings and adequate final show-cause response time, failing which reassessment is required...
Embezzlement losses in charitable institutions remain allowable when misappropriation is established, irrecoverable, and not a specified-person benefi...
National long-distance undertaking status supports deduction where separately licensed infrastructure, resources, revenue, and expenditure establish c...
Agency reimbursement income follows contractual deposit-liability computation, while pending deposit collections do not constitute deemed-dividend loa...
Page of 4883
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 97649 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Adjustment made in the intimation u/s. 143(1) - denying the benefit of deduction/exemption u/s 11 - CIT(A)'s order, justifying the adjustments on the basis of disclosure made by the assessee that it was not registered as a charitable entity, is we find taking a hyper technical view on the issue, particularly when the adjustment was made without affording any opportunity to the assessee as provided in law, coupled with the fact that the assessee had evidenced its registration u/s. 12A of the Act to the Ld. CIT(A) by producing the certificate. Also the Ld. CIT(A) has not addressed the alternative argument of the assessee that even after the adjustments its income was below the taxable limit. - AT
Adjustment made in the intimation u/s. 143(1) - denying the benefit of deduction/exemption u/s 11 - CIT(A)'s order, justifying the adjustments on the basis of disclosure made by the assessee that it was not registered as a charitable entity, is we find taking a hyper technical view on the issue, particularly when the adjustment was made without affording any opportunity to the assessee as provided in law, coupled with the fact that the assessee had evidenced its registration u/s. 12A of the Act to the Ld. CIT(A) by producing the certificate. Also the Ld. CIT(A) has not addressed the alternative argument of the assessee that even after the adjustments its income was below the taxable limit. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4883 
