Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
Refund claim of Special Additional Duty (SAD), under Customs Act, in lieu of sales tax - rejection on the ground of time limitation - The Hon’ble High Court has clearly held that the expression “so far as may be” used in sub-section (6) of Section 3 of CTA, has to be followed to the extent possible. Merely because Section 27 of the Customs Act provides for a period of limitation for filing refund claim, it cannot be held that even for the purposes of claiming refund in terms of the Notification, the same limitation has to be applied. - AT
Refund claim of Special Additional Duty (SAD), under Customs Act, in lieu of sales tax - rejection on the ground of time limitation - The Hon’ble High Court has clearly held that the expression “so far as may be” used in sub-section (6) of Section 3 of CTA, has to be followed to the extent possible. Merely because Section 27 of the Customs Act provides for a period of limitation for filing refund claim, it cannot be held that even for the purposes of claiming refund in terms of the Notification, the same limitation has to be applied. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.