PMLA anticipatory bail requires satisfaction of twin conditions, while predicate-offence protection does not extend to independent money-laundering pr...
School-affiliation charges remain taxable where not directly connected with examinations, while extended limitation requires proof of deliberate tax e...
Dishonor of Cheque - vicarious liability of Independent Directors / company secretary - The complaisant does not particularize the role of the petitioner in regard to facility agreement dated 28th March, 2010 executed by the Company with the complainant; nor the complaint discloses that the alleged offence was committed by the Company in connivance or was a result of the negligence of the petitioner - In absence of averments in the complaint, that petitioner is also “in charge” of the business of the company, the case could not fall under Section 141(1) of the Act. - HC
Dishonor of Cheque - vicarious liability of Independent Directors / company secretary - The complaisant does not particularize the role of the petitioner in regard to facility agreement dated 28th March, 2010 executed by the Company with the complainant; nor the complaint discloses that the alleged offence was committed by the Company in connivance or was a result of the negligence of the petitioner - In absence of averments in the complaint, that petitioner is also “in charge” of the business of the company, the case could not fall under Section 141(1) of the Act. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.