Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
21 to 40 of 95872 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Exemption u/s 10(23C) (vi) - rejection of the application u/s 12AA - allegation of paying interest on unsecured loan to specified persons at higher rate - Whether paying the interest at the rate of 9%/12% to the above then person was a benefit to the specified person, was required to be examined by the AO during the assessment proceedings and for that purposes it was incumbent upon the AO to bring on record the contemporaneous comparative instances of the similar society indicating that the interest of rate paid by the assessee was far more than that was prevailing in the open market. In the light of the above, the first objection raised by the CIT(E) was without any basis. - AT
Exemption u/s 10(23C) (vi) - rejection of the application u/s 12AA - allegation of paying interest on unsecured loan to specified persons at higher rate - Whether paying the interest at the rate of 9%/12% to the above then person was a benefit to the specified person, was required to be examined by the AO during the assessment proceedings and for that purposes it was incumbent upon the AO to bring on record the contemporaneous comparative instances of the similar society indicating that the interest of rate paid by the assessee was far more than that was prevailing in the open market. In the light of the above, the first objection raised by the CIT(E) was without any basis. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
