Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Refund of erroneous payment of service tax - the appellant as a LLP, is not required to pay service tax under the reverse charge mechanism during the period under dispute. - It is held that the appellant is entitled to refund of the service tax paid erroneously under reverse charge, as per the refund application - the adjudicating authority is directed to grant refund within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order with interest - AT
Refund of erroneous payment of service tax - the appellant as a LLP, is not required to pay service tax under the reverse charge mechanism during the period under dispute. - It is held that the appellant is entitled to refund of the service tax paid erroneously under reverse charge, as per the refund application - the adjudicating authority is directed to grant refund within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order with interest - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
