Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Clandestine Removal - reliability of statements - sufficiency of evidence or not - In a serious case such as evasion of duty by fraud, the degree of appreciation of evidence has to be higher than in a case of allegation of mere delay in payment of duty though in both cases the evidence has to be appreciated on the preponderance of probability. - there is enough evidence to establish the case put forth by department. The role of the Managing Director in such activity is also clear. - AT
Clandestine Removal - reliability of statements - sufficiency of evidence or not - In a serious case such as evasion of duty by fraud, the degree of appreciation of evidence has to be higher than in a case of allegation of mere delay in payment of duty though in both cases the evidence has to be appreciated on the preponderance of probability. - there is enough evidence to establish the case put forth by department. The role of the Managing Director in such activity is also clear. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.