Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Addition u/s 68 - Violation of provisions of section 269SS - unexplained cash deposit - Violation of provisions of section 269SS of the I.T.Act calls for penalty u/s 271D of the I.T.Act, which is a separate proceeding. - Violation of provisions of section 269SS of the I.T.Act cannot be the ground for making addition u/s 68 of the I.T.Act. - AT
Addition u/s 68 - Violation of provisions of section 269SS - unexplained cash deposit - Violation of provisions of section 269SS of the I.T.Act calls for penalty u/s 271D of the I.T.Act, which is a separate proceeding. - Violation of provisions of section 269SS of the I.T.Act cannot be the ground for making addition u/s 68 of the I.T.Act. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.