Stock-in-trade transfer taxability follows possession and consideration, not later conveyance registration, limiting deemed-value provisions to the ac...
Alternative statutory remedy under GST bars writ challenge where classification, notice variance, and hearing disputes require factual appellate revie...
Duplicate PAN cancellation timeframe requires prior administrative representation before judicial intervention, ensuring a time-bound decision on the ...
Revision u/s 263 - non application of mind by AO on search figures of income - PCIT has not brought any material to justify the alleged income of ₹ 210 crores. Thus, we note that allegation made by the ld PCIT is based merely on suspicion and conjecture. A mere observation that no proper details have been obtained, cannot be sufficient to come to a conclusion that the assessing officer did not make proper and adequate inquiries which he ought to have made in the given facts and circumstances of this case. - AT
Revision u/s 263 - non application of mind by AO on search figures of income - PCIT has not brought any material to justify the alleged income of ₹ 210 crores. Thus, we note that allegation made by the ld PCIT is based merely on suspicion and conjecture. A mere observation that no proper details have been obtained, cannot be sufficient to come to a conclusion that the assessing officer did not make proper and adequate inquiries which he ought to have made in the given facts and circumstances of this case. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4891 
