Omitted specified domestic transaction provision invalidates related-party expenditure transfer-pricing references and assessments based on consequent...
Preventive suspension requires an immediate continuing threat and cannot become indefinite without inquiry, fresh evidence, or proportionate safeguard...
Refund of excess tax paid - It is upon the petitioner approaching this Court and filing the above Writ Petition, the respondents have set in motion the process of according approval to withhold the refund by invoking Section 40(2) of the Act, as admittedly, the proceeding of the 3rd respondent is dt. 28.11.2020 - the 3rd respondent had admittedly not exercised powers under Section 40(2) of the Act and could not have issued proceedings on 28.11.2020, while this Court is seized of the matter. - The respondents are hereby directed to refund the amount - HC
Refund of excess tax paid - It is upon the petitioner approaching this Court and filing the above Writ Petition, the respondents have set in motion the process of according approval to withhold the refund by invoking Section 40(2) of the Act, as admittedly, the proceeding of the 3rd respondent is dt. 28.11.2020 - the 3rd respondent had admittedly not exercised powers under Section 40(2) of the Act and could not have issued proceedings on 28.11.2020, while this Court is seized of the matter. - The respondents are hereby directed to refund the amount - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.