Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Page of 4778
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
81 to 100 of 95557 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Levy of penalty on shipping line u/s 112 of the Customs Act, 1962 - mis-declaration of goods in description as well as in quantity in bills of landing - As the fact has not been disputed by the Revenue and the mis-declaration of weight and description of the goods was found at the time of physical examination of the goods. - There is no fault of the shipping line - No penalty - AT
Levy of penalty on shipping line u/s 112 of the Customs Act, 1962 - mis-declaration of goods in description as well as in quantity in bills of landing - As the fact has not been disputed by the Revenue and the mis-declaration of weight and description of the goods was found at the time of physical examination of the goods. - There is no fault of the shipping line - No penalty - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.