Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
Validity of application admitted for initiation of CIRP - It cannot be held that there was any dispute in regard to the transaction in question. It seems that in order to avoid the liability, the Corporate Debtor through its reply to notice, tried to impress that there was a pre-existing dispute. - The Civil Suit has been filed after receipt of statutory notice, therefore, such Civil Suit cannot be treated as existence of dispute - AT
Validity of application admitted for initiation of CIRP - It cannot be held that there was any dispute in regard to the transaction in question. It seems that in order to avoid the liability, the Corporate Debtor through its reply to notice, tried to impress that there was a pre-existing dispute. - The Civil Suit has been filed after receipt of statutory notice, therefore, such Civil Suit cannot be treated as existence of dispute - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
