Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
321 to 340 of 95875 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty proceedings u/s. 221(1) - default as per Section 220 - the AR of the assessee could not explain fund availability position on the due date of payment of advance tax as well as on the date of self-assessment tax i.e. date of filing of return. We also observe form the order of the authorities below, the assessment was completed u/s. 144 by rejecting the books of accounts of the assessee which clearly shows that the intention of the assessee was not in favour of the revenue for the payment of tax. It clearly shows that the assessee was not paying the taxes within the stipulated time. - Levy of penlty confirmed - AT
Penalty proceedings u/s. 221(1) - default as per Section 220 - the AR of the assessee could not explain fund availability position on the due date of payment of advance tax as well as on the date of self-assessment tax i.e. date of filing of return. We also observe form the order of the authorities below, the assessment was completed u/s. 144 by rejecting the books of accounts of the assessee which clearly shows that the intention of the assessee was not in favour of the revenue for the payment of tax. It clearly shows that the assessee was not paying the taxes within the stipulated time. - Levy of penlty confirmed - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.