Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95875 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Refund claim - Applicability of Doctrine of unjust enrichment - the purchaser of the goods was not entitled to a claim for refund of duty made under protest by the manufacturer without complying with the mandate of Section 11B of the Act. - HC
Refund claim - Applicability of Doctrine of unjust enrichment - the purchaser of the goods was not entitled to a claim for refund of duty made under protest by the manufacturer without complying with the mandate of Section 11B of the Act. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.