Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Refund claim of market value of gold - Here is the case where the departmental action of confiscation of seized goods came to be set aside by the CESTAT but by the time the Tribunal passed such an order the goods were already disposed of. The petitioner therefore can claim reasonable interest on such principal sum which must be refunded to him. - While not accepting the claim of the petitioner for granting him the market value of the gold on the date of application made by him to the department, it is provided that the value of the gold as estimated at the time of seizure will be paid to the petitioner along with simple interest @ 7.5% per annum - HC
Refund claim of market value of gold - Here is the case where the departmental action of confiscation of seized goods came to be set aside by the CESTAT but by the time the Tribunal passed such an order the goods were already disposed of. The petitioner therefore can claim reasonable interest on such principal sum which must be refunded to him. - While not accepting the claim of the petitioner for granting him the market value of the gold on the date of application made by him to the department, it is provided that the value of the gold as estimated at the time of seizure will be paid to the petitioner along with simple interest @ 7.5% per annum - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
