Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Insolvency and BankruptcyFebruary 4, 2021Case LawsAT
Jurisdiction - power of Tribunal to review its own order - Power of Review has to be granted by statute and the ‘power of Review’ is not an inherent power and therefore cannot be exercised unless conferred specifically or by necessary implications - The error must be a ‘patent error’ which is ‘manifest’ and ‘self-evident’. The submissions of the Review Applicant in this case would amount to re-appraisal of evidence and findings of fact cannot be revisited within the limited scope of exercise of powers under Rule 11. - AT
Jurisdiction - power of Tribunal to review its own order - Power of Review has to be granted by statute and the ‘power of Review’ is not an inherent power and therefore cannot be exercised unless conferred specifically or by necessary implications - The error must be a ‘patent error’ which is ‘manifest’ and ‘self-evident’. The submissions of the Review Applicant in this case would amount to re-appraisal of evidence and findings of fact cannot be revisited within the limited scope of exercise of powers under Rule 11. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4915 
