Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Profiteering - restaurant service supplied by the Respondent - the GST rate of 5% has been charged w.e.f. 15.11.2017 however the base prices of 170 products have been increased more than their commensurate prices w.e.f. 15.11.2017 which established that because of the increase in the base prices the cum-tax prices paid by the consumers were not reduced commensurately, despite the reduction in the GST rate. - As per the provisions of Sec 171 (1) read with Rule 133 (1) the profiteered amount is determined as ₹ 6,66,700/- - NAPA
Profiteering - restaurant service supplied by the Respondent - the GST rate of 5% has been charged w.e.f. 15.11.2017 however the base prices of 170 products have been increased more than their commensurate prices w.e.f. 15.11.2017 which established that because of the increase in the base prices the cum-tax prices paid by the consumers were not reduced commensurately, despite the reduction in the GST rate. - As per the provisions of Sec 171 (1) read with Rule 133 (1) the profiteered amount is determined as ₹ 6,66,700/- - NAPA
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
