Contingency expenses, exempt-income disallowance, and royalty benchmarking: unsupported adjustments were deleted under consistent accounting and trans...
Disciplinary proportionality requires penalties for Authorised Representative misconduct to match proven harm, leading to reconsideration of registrat...
Addition u/s 68 and 69C - It is neither the AO’s case that the loan creditors are not income-tax assessee’s nor has he alleged that the documents and evidences furnished by the appellant in support of loan transactions were false or suffered from defects or do not tally with the Department’s records. - Aggregate additions being principal loan amount received by the appellant from the fifteen bodies corporate did not constitute its income chargeable u/s 68 of the Act. - AT
Addition u/s 68 and 69C - It is neither the AO’s case that the loan creditors are not income-tax assessee’s nor has he alleged that the documents and evidences furnished by the appellant in support of loan transactions were false or suffered from defects or do not tally with the Department’s records. - Aggregate additions being principal loan amount received by the appellant from the fifteen bodies corporate did not constitute its income chargeable u/s 68 of the Act. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4918 
