Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - If authority is satisfied that there was a reasonable cause, it may impose any penalty but inadvertent mistake cannot call for penalty in the absence of any material to show there is gross negligency or want of bona fides on the part of the assessee. - In the instant case, we find no such gross negligency on the part of the assessee and thus in our considered opinion the penalty should be justified for an inadvertent mistake committed by the assessee. - AT
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - If authority is satisfied that there was a reasonable cause, it may impose any penalty but inadvertent mistake cannot call for penalty in the absence of any material to show there is gross negligency or want of bona fides on the part of the assessee. - In the instant case, we find no such gross negligency on the part of the assessee and thus in our considered opinion the penalty should be justified for an inadvertent mistake committed by the assessee. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4915 
