Opportunity to furnish unsecured-loan confirmations is required before reassessment initiation; proceedings require fresh consideration after taxpayer...
Under-reporting on a first reassessment return attracts penalty, while enhanced misreporting penalty requires proof of a statutory misreporting catego...
Insolvency and BankruptcyNovember 21, 2020Case LawsAT
Direction issued to the Appellant / ROC, West Bengal to restore the name of the Company for completion of ‘Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process’ effectively in the register of Companies cannot be found fault with. However, the further direction issued by the Tribunal, to the Appellant ‘not to levy any fee / penalty’ to the Company because Company is in ‘Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process’ is legally untenable - AT
Direction issued to the Appellant / ROC, West Bengal to restore the name of the Company for completion of ‘Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process’ effectively in the register of Companies cannot be found fault with. However, the further direction issued by the Tribunal, to the Appellant ‘not to levy any fee / penalty’ to the Company because Company is in ‘Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process’ is legally untenable - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4916 
