Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Revision u/s 263 - AO allowed the claim of carried forward of losses u/s 72A based on an incorrect assumption of facts - The action of the assessing officer, though prejudicial, can hardly be termed as ‘erroneous’ in so far as the officer has followed the dictum laid down by the Supreme Court - HC
Revision u/s 263 - AO allowed the claim of carried forward of losses u/s 72A based on an incorrect assumption of facts - The action of the assessing officer, though prejudicial, can hardly be termed as ‘erroneous’ in so far as the officer has followed the dictum laid down by the Supreme Court - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.