Pre-existing disputes over outcome-based professional fees can bar Section 9 insolvency proceedings where contractual entitlement requires investigati...
Corresponding scheduled offences preserve money-laundering jurisdiction despite repeal of the central corruption provision where conduct remains cover...
Concurrent anticipatory-bail jurisdiction permits applications before either forum, while secured evidence may negate custodial interrogation in GST e...
Page of 4881
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 97618 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Revision u/s 263 or appeal-able order before CIT(A) u/s 246A - Subject matter of revision was limited - Doctrine of merger - CIT(A) and ITAT rejected the appeal of assessee - appeal is maintainable in respect of the subject matter, which does not pertain to grounds u/s 263 of the Act. The CIT(A) therefore, ought to have adjudicated the appeal on merits to the aforesaid extent. - HC
Revision u/s 263 or appeal-able order before CIT(A) u/s 246A - Subject matter of revision was limited - Doctrine of merger - CIT(A) and ITAT rejected the appeal of assessee - appeal is maintainable in respect of the subject matter, which does not pertain to grounds u/s 263 of the Act. The CIT(A) therefore, ought to have adjudicated the appeal on merits to the aforesaid extent. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.