Credit-note turnover adjustments preserve inverted-duty refunds, while ministerial re-computation does not constitute an impermissible appellate reman...
Revisional jurisdiction over export quota premium deductions requires both error and Revenue prejudice; a permissible assessment view cannot be displa...
Page of 4881
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
501 to 520 of 97618 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Revision u/s 263 or appeal-able order before CIT(A) u/s 246A - Subject matter of revision was limited - Doctrine of merger - CIT(A) and ITAT rejected the appeal of assessee - appeal is maintainable in respect of the subject matter, which does not pertain to grounds u/s 263 of the Act. The CIT(A) therefore, ought to have adjudicated the appeal on merits to the aforesaid extent. - HC
Revision u/s 263 or appeal-able order before CIT(A) u/s 246A - Subject matter of revision was limited - Doctrine of merger - CIT(A) and ITAT rejected the appeal of assessee - appeal is maintainable in respect of the subject matter, which does not pertain to grounds u/s 263 of the Act. The CIT(A) therefore, ought to have adjudicated the appeal on merits to the aforesaid extent. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.