Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 95715 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Denying the benefit u/s 91 - Tax Credit - Income accrue in India - assessee being “Resident but not Ordinarily Resident" is not a “Resident in India” - persons who are ‘resident but not ordinarily resident’ in India are forming larger group of the persons who are ‘resident’ in India. - we reject the contentions of the revenue that benefit of section 91 (1) of the act does not apply to a person who is ‘not ordinarily resident’ in India. - AT
Denying the benefit u/s 91 - Tax Credit - Income accrue in India - assessee being “Resident but not Ordinarily Resident" is not a “Resident in India” - persons who are ‘resident but not ordinarily resident’ in India are forming larger group of the persons who are ‘resident’ in India. - we reject the contentions of the revenue that benefit of section 91 (1) of the act does not apply to a person who is ‘not ordinarily resident’ in India. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.