Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Denying the benefit u/s 91 - Tax Credit - Income accrue in India - assessee being “Resident but not Ordinarily Resident" is not a “Resident in India” - persons who are ‘resident but not ordinarily resident’ in India are forming larger group of the persons who are ‘resident’ in India. - we reject the contentions of the revenue that benefit of section 91 (1) of the act does not apply to a person who is ‘not ordinarily resident’ in India. - AT
Denying the benefit u/s 91 - Tax Credit - Income accrue in India - assessee being “Resident but not Ordinarily Resident" is not a “Resident in India” - persons who are ‘resident but not ordinarily resident’ in India are forming larger group of the persons who are ‘resident’ in India. - we reject the contentions of the revenue that benefit of section 91 (1) of the act does not apply to a person who is ‘not ordinarily resident’ in India. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.