Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Imposition of penalty u/s 114 AA of Customs Act for abatement - Textile Broker - allegation that appellant facilatated in inflating the FOB value for the purpose of wrongly claiming higher DEPB benefits - it is found that this appellant have facilitated the main accused M/s J.S. Designer Ltd. and its Directors in inflating FOB value of goods for export, by justifying the cost, indirectly - Levy of penalty confirmed (reduced from ₹ 25 lakhs to ₹ 7,50,000/- ) - AT
Imposition of penalty u/s 114 AA of Customs Act for abatement - Textile Broker - allegation that appellant facilatated in inflating the FOB value for the purpose of wrongly claiming higher DEPB benefits - it is found that this appellant have facilitated the main accused M/s J.S. Designer Ltd. and its Directors in inflating FOB value of goods for export, by justifying the cost, indirectly - Levy of penalty confirmed (reduced from ₹ 25 lakhs to ₹ 7,50,000/- ) - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
