Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Imposition of penalty u/s 114 AA of Customs Act for abatement - Textile Broker - allegation that appellant facilatated in inflating the FOB value for the purpose of wrongly claiming higher DEPB benefits - it is found that this appellant have facilitated the main accused M/s J.S. Designer Ltd. and its Directors in inflating FOB value of goods for export, by justifying the cost, indirectly - Levy of penalty confirmed (reduced from ₹ 25 lakhs to ₹ 7,50,000/- ) - AT
Imposition of penalty u/s 114 AA of Customs Act for abatement - Textile Broker - allegation that appellant facilatated in inflating the FOB value for the purpose of wrongly claiming higher DEPB benefits - it is found that this appellant have facilitated the main accused M/s J.S. Designer Ltd. and its Directors in inflating FOB value of goods for export, by justifying the cost, indirectly - Levy of penalty confirmed (reduced from ₹ 25 lakhs to ₹ 7,50,000/- ) - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
