Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Levy of penalty on Customs Broker u/s 114 and 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 - allegation that appellant had helped in claiming false drawback by misdeclaration - - appellant have not done any act or omission nor knowingly used any document for the clearance knowing to be false. The appellant have given cogent explanation as regards the undervaluation, that the samples shown to them were of good quality and hence on such reasonable belief they have undertaken the clearance work. - Penalty deleted - AT
Levy of penalty on Customs Broker u/s 114 and 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 - allegation that appellant had helped in claiming false drawback by misdeclaration - - appellant have not done any act or omission nor knowingly used any document for the clearance knowing to be false. The appellant have given cogent explanation as regards the undervaluation, that the samples shown to them were of good quality and hence on such reasonable belief they have undertaken the clearance work. - Penalty deleted - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
