Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - There cannot be a penalty merely on the basis that the assessee has disclosed income after receiving the notice from the ADIT and the income was accepted during survey proceedings - No incriminating documents discovered during the course of survey at the premises of the assessee. Similarly, the additional income offered by the assessee in return filed in response to notice under section 148 of the Act admitted as it is by the AO. - No penalty - AT
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - There cannot be a penalty merely on the basis that the assessee has disclosed income after receiving the notice from the ADIT and the income was accepted during survey proceedings - No incriminating documents discovered during the course of survey at the premises of the assessee. Similarly, the additional income offered by the assessee in return filed in response to notice under section 148 of the Act admitted as it is by the AO. - No penalty - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.