Revisional jurisdiction over export quota premium deductions requires both error and Revenue prejudice; a permissible assessment view cannot be displa...
Final benami adjudication bars contradictory tax-evasion prosecution where settlement findings confirm full disclosure and cooperation without conceal...
Faceless assessment and registration procedures are updated through electronic communication, revised recovery rules, extended deadlines, and replacem...
Risk-based selective vessel boarding requires accurate declarations and preserves master and agent liability where physical inspections are not select...
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - There cannot be a penalty merely on the basis that the assessee has disclosed income after receiving the notice from the ADIT and the income was accepted during survey proceedings - No incriminating documents discovered during the course of survey at the premises of the assessee. Similarly, the additional income offered by the assessee in return filed in response to notice under section 148 of the Act admitted as it is by the AO. - No penalty - AT
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - There cannot be a penalty merely on the basis that the assessee has disclosed income after receiving the notice from the ADIT and the income was accepted during survey proceedings - No incriminating documents discovered during the course of survey at the premises of the assessee. Similarly, the additional income offered by the assessee in return filed in response to notice under section 148 of the Act admitted as it is by the AO. - No penalty - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.