Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Insolvency and BankruptcyAugust 31, 2020Case LawsAT
Whether an advance amount for supply of goods can be considered as an Operational Debt under Section 5(20) of the I&B Code? - the advance amount paid by the Respondent No. 1 to Respondent No. 2 for supply of Sugar is not an Operational Debt, even if Respondent No. 2 failed to supply the Sugar to Respondent No. 1. - AT
Whether an advance amount for supply of goods can be considered as an Operational Debt under Section 5(20) of the I&B Code? - the advance amount paid by the Respondent No. 1 to Respondent No. 2 for supply of Sugar is not an Operational Debt, even if Respondent No. 2 failed to supply the Sugar to Respondent No. 1. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
