Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Profiteering - restaurant services - allegation that benefit of reduction in GST rate not passed on by way of commensurate reduction in prices - contravention of section 171 of CGST Act - since the recipients of the benefit, as determined, are not identifiable, the respondent is directed to deposit the amount in two equal parts in the Central Consumer Welfare Fund and the Maharashtra State Consumer Welfare Fund.
Profiteering - restaurant services - allegation that benefit of reduction in GST rate not passed on by way of commensurate reduction in prices - contravention of section 171 of CGST Act - since the recipients of the benefit, as determined, are not identifiable, the respondent is directed to deposit the amount in two equal parts in the Central Consumer Welfare Fund and the Maharashtra State Consumer Welfare Fund.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
