Membership-consent thresholds for oppression petitions are satisfied by unchallenged voter-list consents, while unsupported forgery claims require pro...
Juridical seat versus arbitral venue determines supervisory court jurisdiction, while timely award challenges remain within the prescribed limitation ...
Insolvency and BankruptcyJune 24, 2020Case LawsBoard
Disciplinary Action against the Insolvency Resolution Professional (IRP) - The RP has displayed utter misunderstanding of the provisions of the Code and Regulations made thereunder. He has contravened the provisions. - The DC is conscious of the fact that the profession of IP is in a stage in which IPs are striving to learn. Even though it is incumbent upon them to build and safeguard the reputation of the profession which should enjoy the trust of the society and inspire confidence of all the stakeholders, they may not be kept away from practicing the profession especially in the absence of any malafide intention and more so when the objective of the Code i.e. resolution has been achieved within the prescribed timelines.
Disciplinary Action against the Insolvency Resolution Professional (IRP) - The RP has displayed utter misunderstanding of the provisions of the Code and Regulations made thereunder. He has contravened the provisions. - The DC is conscious of the fact that the profession of IP is in a stage in which IPs are striving to learn. Even though it is incumbent upon them to build and safeguard the reputation of the profession which should enjoy the trust of the society and inspire confidence of all the stakeholders, they may not be kept away from practicing the profession especially in the absence of any malafide intention and more so when the objective of the Code i.e. resolution has been achieved within the prescribed timelines.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.