Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
Impermissibility to levy cess in terms of the provisions of Section 21 of the Act, 1972 in view of the advent of GST - Mere existence of a prima facie case is not sufficient to grant an interim order against Revenue but several other factors like balance of convenience, irreparable injury, public interest, etc. are also to be taken into consideration.
Impermissibility to levy cess in terms of the provisions of Section 21 of the Act, 1972 in view of the advent of GST - Mere existence of a prima facie case is not sufficient to grant an interim order against Revenue but several other factors like balance of convenience, irreparable injury, public interest, etc. are also to be taken into consideration.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.