Appellate jurisdiction over baggage imports is excluded, requiring confiscation challenges involving passenger-carried gold to proceed by statutory re...
Article 227 review permits intervention in arbitration only for manifest, patent inherent jurisdictional defects, not representational authority dispu...
Demand of CENVAT Credit by invoking extended period of limitation since process is not amount to manufacture - the erroneous payment of the appellant made as central excise duty was not detected by the department despite the appellant disclosing in their returns the details which they were mandatorily required to disclose. - Demand set aside.
Demand of CENVAT Credit by invoking extended period of limitation since process is not amount to manufacture - the erroneous payment of the appellant made as central excise duty was not detected by the department despite the appellant disclosing in their returns the details which they were mandatorily required to disclose. - Demand set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
