Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Insolvency and BankruptcyApril 22, 2020Case LawsAT
Initiation of CIRP - Ex-parte order - The Appellant has admitted that the Court notice was received by its employee on 17th August 2019, but he left the organisation on 03rd October 2019. Since the said employee was in active employment of the Appellant/Corporate Debtor when he received the notice, thus it is clear that the order to proceed the case ex-parte is fully justified
Initiation of CIRP - Ex-parte order - The Appellant has admitted that the Court notice was received by its employee on 17th August 2019, but he left the organisation on 03rd October 2019. Since the said employee was in active employment of the Appellant/Corporate Debtor when he received the notice, thus it is clear that the order to proceed the case ex-parte is fully justified
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4793
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
