Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Applicability of interest to CENVAT credit recovery - Availed versus Taken and / or utilization of credit - Recovery of CENVAT credit wrongly taken or erroneously refunded - it is unusual for ‘utilization’ to be qualified with ‘ineligibility’ on its own as ‘utilization’ is solely for the purpose of discharge of tax/duty liability which, even if not warranted, does not, by any stretch of usage, behove description as ‘wrongly.’ Such a transferred epithet can only reasonably mean ‘utilization’ after having been wrongly taken and, thereby, made ineligible. - AT
Applicability of interest to CENVAT credit recovery - Availed versus Taken and / or utilization of credit - Recovery of CENVAT credit wrongly taken or erroneously refunded - it is unusual for ‘utilization’ to be qualified with ‘ineligibility’ on its own as ‘utilization’ is solely for the purpose of discharge of tax/duty liability which, even if not warranted, does not, by any stretch of usage, behove description as ‘wrongly.’ Such a transferred epithet can only reasonably mean ‘utilization’ after having been wrongly taken and, thereby, made ineligible. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
