Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Jurisdiction - Central GST authority or State GST authority - Validity of investigation initiated by the respondents and the summons issued in connection with the said investigation - Section 6(2)(1)(b) - Since the offences reflected from the transactions were made in more than one State, the respondents had all the powers for initiating a proceeding under the provisions of Section 132 of the CGST Act, 2017. - HC
Jurisdiction - Central GST authority or State GST authority - Validity of investigation initiated by the respondents and the summons issued in connection with the said investigation - Section 6(2)(1)(b) - Since the offences reflected from the transactions were made in more than one State, the respondents had all the powers for initiating a proceeding under the provisions of Section 132 of the CGST Act, 2017. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.