Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Misdeclaration of imported goods - the goods in question cannot be termed as ‘prohibited goods’ merely for misdeclaration in the Bills of Entry, for the purpose of imposing penalty u/s 112 - the Customs Duty sought to be evaded is nowhere quantified - Maximum penalty is ₹ 5000
Misdeclaration of imported goods - the goods in question cannot be termed as ‘prohibited goods’ merely for misdeclaration in the Bills of Entry, for the purpose of imposing penalty u/s 112 - the Customs Duty sought to be evaded is nowhere quantified - Maximum penalty is ₹ 5000
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
