Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Rental income received by the appellant from sub-letting of the "Kantilal House" premises to Bank of Baroda - taxable either u/s.22 or u/s.56 - for the purpose of Sec. 27(iiib) r.w.s. 269UA(f)(i), the assessee was deemed owner of the property and therefore, the stated income was rightly brought to tax by revenue authorities as Income from House Property
Rental income received by the appellant from sub-letting of the "Kantilal House" premises to Bank of Baroda - taxable either u/s.22 or u/s.56 - for the purpose of Sec. 27(iiib) r.w.s. 269UA(f)(i), the assessee was deemed owner of the property and therefore, the stated income was rightly brought to tax by revenue authorities as Income from House Property
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
