Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Imposition of penalty - discrepancy in Form 38, E-Sugam form - the Officer managing the Check Post after verifying the goods should have filled up the Column 8 of Form 38 in accordance with the documents and there was no occasion for imposing a penalty as has been done by the Assessing Officer and upheld by the Commercial Tax Tribunal.
Imposition of penalty - discrepancy in Form 38, E-Sugam form - the Officer managing the Check Post after verifying the goods should have filled up the Column 8 of Form 38 in accordance with the documents and there was no occasion for imposing a penalty as has been done by the Assessing Officer and upheld by the Commercial Tax Tribunal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
