Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
All these show cause notices are speaking about the records from 01.04.2009 to 31.03.2010 which apparently and admittedly is not the period of demand in any of these show cause notices. The show cause notices are opined to be vague. - SCN of 2014 could rely upon the contents of the SCN of the year 2012 but later also a no detail except reliance upon SCN of 2008 which is not permissible - Resultantly, all four SCNs here are silent providing any basis to proceed against the appellant.
All these show cause notices are speaking about the records from 01.04.2009 to 31.03.2010 which apparently and admittedly is not the period of demand in any of these show cause notices. The show cause notices are opined to be vague. - SCN of 2014 could rely upon the contents of the SCN of the year 2012 but later also a no detail except reliance upon SCN of 2008 which is not permissible - Resultantly, all four SCNs here are silent providing any basis to proceed against the appellant.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.