Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Imposition of penalties on CHA u/s 114(i) of Customs Act, 1962 - The sole allegation against the ‘Custom House Agent’ is that they allowed unauthorized use of their licence - a proposition, which fails the test of reasonableness, must be corrected by evidence but a statement of retraction does not have to be - No penalty.
Imposition of penalties on CHA u/s 114(i) of Customs Act, 1962 - The sole allegation against the ‘Custom House Agent’ is that they allowed unauthorized use of their licence - a proposition, which fails the test of reasonableness, must be corrected by evidence but a statement of retraction does not have to be - No penalty.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.