Consequential appeal-effect orders must implement rectification deleting working-capital adjustments and reconsider the resulting arm's-length range c...
Discounted cash flow valuation protects share premium where projections are reasonable, while audited book expenses defeat unexplained-expenditure add...
Section 54 construction relief survives pre-transfer commencement when completion occurs within the statutory period, excluding ineligible spouse-owne...
Fraud classification show-cause notices founded on inconclusive forensic audit material cannot sustain action, permitting fresh proceedings on conclus...
Imposition of penalties on CHA u/s 114(i) of Customs Act, 1962 - The sole allegation against the ‘Custom House Agent’ is that they allowed unauthorized use of their licence - a proposition, which fails the test of reasonableness, must be corrected by evidence but a statement of retraction does not have to be - No penalty.
Imposition of penalties on CHA u/s 114(i) of Customs Act, 1962 - The sole allegation against the ‘Custom House Agent’ is that they allowed unauthorized use of their licence - a proposition, which fails the test of reasonableness, must be corrected by evidence but a statement of retraction does not have to be - No penalty.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.